So I've been using OS X this week at home and at work. On my home hardware I'm not at all thrilled with video performance, which has been my #1 complaint since I installed 10.0.0. And I even have 1.5GB of ram and 32MB of video ram!
While 10.2 is better, I think Apple has mislead a lot of people in regards to which hardware should run it. It really needs a 733mhz or higher G4, at least compared to the 400mhz at home. Getting the OS to boot and run and having the OS perform adequately are two separate things entirely. Matt seems to be ok with it on his 2001 iBook, he doesn't use it in a heavy production-type environment, mostly just text-editing and coding, and web browsing. Of course, he thinks I complain for purely personal reasons. Not quite. I have a bigger picture of OS X I need to think about. Mainly the fact I admin 50+ Macs for a living at work.
Macfixit: Giving Mac OS 9 the Boot collects a large number of reader's input.
As I'm experiencing at work, OS X and the vendor support is just not there. Not there at all.
Greg Norman writes: “In three words: Large Format Printers. What good is a $3,500 to $6,000 printer if it will only run in OS9. Neither Epson or HP has announced they will make drivers for OSX for there large format printers.
Let's not forget
Creo,
Gretag-Macbeth, and many of the other high end vendors I buy from. Though Gretag is slowly cranking out some carbon apps and drivers.
Frank Lazar adds: “In DTP we depend on a variety of high-end devices mainly scanners, calibration devices, and printers from companies such as Heisenberg and Gretag, devices which access hardware in a way that can't be done in Classic. Apple has failed entirely to the point of not even appearing to make an effort to win these companies to the fold. Apple does not have the lever of market dominance to enforce compliance by numbers alone as Microsoft does.
After 2 years, only some of are Agfa products even have OS X betas out. And some of our other scanners are not supported at all.
Many publishing firms, digital video houses and service bureaus have significant investments in Mac OS 9 applications and compatible hardware, meaning equally massive investments have been, and will continue to be required in order to totally adopt Mac OS X.
Aside from the extreme cost, many users simply find Mac OS 9 comfortable, and are staunchly opposed to having an operating system choice forced upon them.
David Hannon writes: “Apple is alienating and dividing its users. There are many private individuals, and large publishing companies, who will never switch to OS X because of the costs involved in upgrading all their software. Add to that the cost of the learning curve to understand the intricacies of the new operating system, and it will never be worth it to them. If Apple abandons OS 9 they will see millions moving to dreaded Windows machines because it is a known standard. They won’t be adopting OS X as Apple hopes.”
Here where I work, I have to fall into the latter group. We'll be migrating all 50+ Mac OS 8.6/9.0 systems to Windows 2000 on Dell Hardware. There's not sense in throwing in another OS that I will be the sole support for, even if half of our business uses Solaris. Solaris and Mac OS X are different beasts.
So. I don't think I'm the only Mac OS Admin out there having to make tough decisions. My personal gripes with Aqua and OS X aside, there are substantial issues involved with migrating to this new OS across the board in publishing and print fields.
So. Apple. What's up?
As far as I can tell...you are definitely going to remain a "consumer" focused company, with theses little "i"apps with some net appliance things.
I know Mac OS X is the future. But I don't think you have any clue on how to get your installed base of loyal users there. Especially in my area.