So over the past week or so I've been reading the San Francisco Chronicle's Lethal Beauty series about the number of people who commit suicide by jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge.
There's this movement to erect a suicide barrier on the bridge and I guess I think it is all pretty much crazy talk. Of course, suicide and "crazy talk" probably go hand-in-hand with much of the public's perception of it all.
Yes. There are many people out there that feel that suicide is a valid option.
I speak from some experience since 13 years ago I was right there with them and know the thoughts intimately.
But by merely making something more of an obstacle doesn't mean that the person is going to not attempt suicide elsewhere.
Is it the City and the State's job to make sure that the suicidal don't act on their thoughts? Is it the taxpayer's responsibility to make sure that such things as bridges and cliffs and other high elevated areas are "protected" from the tiny minute percentage of the population that has issues to deal with and may (or may not) use a given location to end their life?
I just think the amount of time and money on such a thing as "barrier prevention" is wasted and it could be much better spent on those who are living without intent to commit suicide.
When it comes to ending one's life, I don't give a damn what psychologists and such think. There are three types of people who think about suicide: #1 the ones that go over the precipice and kill themselves, #2 the ones that dangle on the precipice but something pulls them back, and #3 the ones that use suicide for pure and simple attention because they have a lot of issues in general.
While there may be some basic so-called early warning signs, a person that will fall into #1 will fall into #1 and will kill themselves and will succeed. I have nothing wrong with this nor do I have pity on those that do. You have to understand me on this. Having been a #2 I understand the #1 types at a level that gives their acts a sense of honor and dignity that so many would think horrid but it isn't. There is no magic religious bullshit clouding my thoughts and emotions on the matter. It is a completely amoral act to me. You either commit suicide or you do not. Your reasons for doing so are your own really.
The number #2 group, and I believe there are many of us out there, were seconds away from being in the #1 group. But something either inside of us or external to us put us on different paths. Most of us don't talk about it because we find the means to cope with what lead us to almost become #1s and move on. I think that many of us still constantly teeter on that precipice but the shere fact we still live means that our little mental ghost worlds are strong enough to prevent us from going over.
The #2s in the world need to get together, openly talk about the moment we turned back, and then severely beat the shit out of the #3s. We should give them nightmares and pain that would make them wish they were the #1s. And the thing is that the #3s know this to be true. That is their ultimate failure. They are nothing more than charade. And deep down they know it and they know that the rest of the world knows it too.
What did any of this have to do with the Golden Gate Bridge?
Well. It is my favoritest bridge in the whole world. The Golden Gate itself is one of my favoritest areas in the world. It is in some incredible way a wonderful place to end one's life given that there are a helluva lot worse places. Hell, I want my own ashes to be thrown off the west side of the bridge out into the Pacific.
But putting up a barrier to stop someone from killing themselves by jumping off it isn't going to stop those people from killing themselves.
I'm sorry.
It may make you feel better and help you to live with those "poor folks" that will jump but it won't make much difference.